Tuesday, September 11, 2012

1209.1650 (Daniel P. Shoemaker et al.)

Phase relations in K_xFe_{2-y}Se_2 and the structure of superconducting
K_xFe_2Se_2 via high-resolution synchrotron diffraction
   [PDF]

Daniel P. Shoemaker, Duck Young Chung, Helmut Claus, Melanie C. Francisco, Sevda Avci, Anna Llobet, Mercouri G. Kanatzidis
Superconductivity in iron selenides has experienced a rapid growth, but not without major inconsistencies in the reported properties. For alkali-intercalated iron selenides, even the structure of the superconducting phase is a subject of debate, in part because the onset of superconductivity is affected much more delicately by stoichiometry and preparation than in cuprate or pnictide superconductors. If high-quality, pure, superconducting intercalated iron selenides are ever to be made, the intertwined physics and chemistry must be explained by systematic studies of how these materials form and by and identifying the many coexisting phases. To that end, we prepared pure K_2Fe_4Se_5 powder and superconductors in the K_xFe_{2-y}Se_2 system, and examined differences in their structures by high-resolution synchrotron and single-crystal x-ray diffraction. We found four distinct phases: semiconducting K_2Fe_4Se_5, a metallic superconducting phase K_xFe_2Se_2 with x ranging from 0.38 to 0.58, an insulator KFe_{1.6}Se_2 with no vacancy ordering, and an oxidized phase K_{0.51(5)}Fe_{0.70(2)}Se that forms the PbClF structure upon exposure to moisture. We find that the vacancy-ordered phase K_2Fe_4Se_5 does not become superconducting by doping, but the distinct iron-rich minority phase K_xFe_2Se_2 precipitates from single crystals upon cooling from above the vacancy ordering temperature. This coexistence of metallic and semiconducting phases explains a broad maximum in resistivity around 100 K. Further studies to understand the solubility of excess Fe in the K_xFe_{2-y}Se_2 structure will shed light on the maximum fraction of superconducting K_xFe_2Se_2 that can be obtained by solid state synthesis.
View original: http://arxiv.org/abs/1209.1650

No comments:

Post a Comment